Test scope, screenshots, checkpoint findings and tier rationale were supplied by an identified reviewer. Identity is retained internally unless public attribution is explicitly enabled.
VitruvianMD
VitruvianMD develops AI-assisted fertility and laboratory technology intended to improve IVF and sperm-analysis workflows.
Sandbox Africa checked the submitted evidence and promoted the verified checkpoint record. Any visible adjustment is identified rather than silently rewritten.
The official public tier and technical record below are the verified publication outcome.
Tier 1 — Functional MVP
Keep Tier 1. Real clinical testing/deployment evidence moves the product beyond concept stage, but regulated market readiness remains insufficiently verified for Tier 2.
What worked: Public website; straightforward navigation; good observed performance; demo-request form. What failed / remained inaccessible: Self-service registration; public login; direct diagnostic-platform access; independent testing of AI-assisted diagnostics, digital microscopy and automated sperm-analysis workflows. Errors found: No material website error was supplied; the principal limitation was product accessibility rather than an observed failure of the underlying diagnostic technology. Access limitations: No public product environment; access dependent on email/contact and demo request.
Why not one higher: Tier 2 would require stronger direct evidence of the actual diagnostic product through a controlled test or accessible demonstration environment.
Verified findings and limitations
The intern could verify the company/product presentation but not independently operate the regulated clinical core workflow.
The current official site describes deployment for testing in multiple clinics and ongoing regulatory/commercial development. The site’s own CE-mark timing claim should not be treated as completed regulatory approval without separate confirmation.
Market and regulatory readiness are not independently established at the level required for a market-ready healthcare product classification.
No live clinic workflow, diagnostic accuracy validation, regulatory certificate or customer production environment was independently reviewed.
What was actually assessed
Is it live? Yes Functioning company website exists. Website access Working Public website accessible. Sign-up Not available No self-service account creation. Sign-in Not available No login functionality. Direct platform access Not available Diagnostic platform could not be directly accessed. Contact Available Email contact. Demo Available Demo can be requested through a website form. Core functionality Could Not Verify Underlying diagnostic technology was not publicly accessible for direct testing.
Edge on Windows 11
New public account
Access limitations: No public product environment; access dependent on email/contact and demo request.
What was observed
These images formed part of the evidence pack considered during verification. Full-standard records retain the contributor's factual caption for each screenshot.
Seven checkpoint assessment
The verified result is the official public checkpoint record. For earlier-standard reviews, these findings may have been reconstructed from preserved evidence during Sandbox Africa’s 2026 audit; they are not presented as if the contributor originally completed a structured worksheet. Contributor-submitted checkpoint wording is shown only where explicit public reviewer attribution has been enabled.
Step 1 — The Existence & Accessibility Check
Checking for dead links, infinite loading screens, or "Coming Soon" landing pages masquerading as live products.
Functioning company website exists.
Can a user or enterprise actually sign up, or is it gated behind broken "Contact Sales" forms?
No self-service registration; no direct login; no public product environment; company contact required; demo requires form submission; users must wait for assistance. Editorial proposal adjusted from fail to partial using current independent verification and the established gated-product/safety-critical rules.
Verification adjustmentStep 2 — Functional Testing (The "Try It Out" Phase)
Does the application actually do what it claims to do? (e.g. a payment gateway completing a test transaction, a logistics app's routing engine working.)
Access company website Open website and navigate public pages User should understand offering and find an access path Website was accessible and straightforward to navigate Working Create account / sign in Look for self-service registration and login User should be able to create/access account No sign-up or sign-in functionality was available Not available Request demo Open demo/contact form User should be able to request a demonstration Demo request form was available Working Test diagnostic workflow Attempt to access actual AI/digital microscopy platform User should be able to exercise core diagnostic workflow Underlying diagnostic platform was not publicly accessible Not verifiable Editorial proposal adjusted from not_assessed to partial using current independent verification and the established gated-product/safety-critical rules.
Verification adjustmentAssessing the logical flow, responsiveness, and basic accessibility of the platform.
Good and straightforward Editorial proposal adjusted from pass to partial using current independent verification and the established gated-product/safety-critical rules.
Verification adjustmentStep 3 — Technical & Architectural Assessment
Load speeds, uptime reliability, and basic stress responses.
Performance was good Editorial proposal adjusted from pass to partial using current independent verification and the established gated-product/safety-critical rules.
Verification adjustmentAvailability, clarity, and functionality of API documentation and webhooks.
Not publicly available Editorial proposal adjusted from not_assessed to partial using current independent verification and the established gated-product/safety-critical rules.
Verification adjustmentSSL certification, basic encryption standards, and data handling transparency.
Not fully verifiable Editorial proposal adjusted from not_assessed to partial using current independent verification and the established gated-product/safety-critical rules.
Verification adjustmentRepresent VitruvianMD?
Claiming verifies company ownership and enables a response or additional evidence. It does not permit editing of the independent review.