1SolutionIdentity 2EvidenceScope + screenshots 3Checkpoints7 findings 4ConclusionTier + rationale 5ProvenanceReviewer record 1 · Solution identity Identify the solution precisely Use official product information. These fields become the public identity record after approval. Company / product name Required · published Website URL Required · published Logo URL Required · published Sector Required · published Headquarters / primary country Required · publishedSelect an African countrySouth AfricaAlgeriaAngolaBeninBotswanaBurkina FasoBurundiCabo VerdeCameroonCentral African RepublicChadComorosDemocratic Republic of the CongoRepublic of the CongoCote d'IvoireDjiboutiEgyptEquatorial GuineaEritreaEswatiniEthiopiaGabonGambiaGhanaGuineaGuinea-BissauKenyaLesothoLiberiaLibyaMadagascarMalawiMaliMauritaniaMauritiusMoroccoMozambiqueNamibiaNigerNigeriaRwandaSao Tome and PrincipeSenegalSeychellesSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth SudanSudanTanzaniaTogoTunisiaUgandaZambiaZimbabwe Technology stack Required · published What does the solution claim to do? Required · publishedMinimum 100 characters. Next: document exactly what you tested.Continue to evidence 2 · Test scope and evidence State exactly what you tested A reader should understand the boundaries of the assessment before reading the conclusion. Review scope and test sequence Required · publishedMinimum 80 characters. Test environment / device / browser Required · published Account or access type Required · published Access limitations Required · published Supporting evidence URL Required · published Date assessed Required · published Screenshot evidence Required · 2 to 6 filesEach screenshot must be at least 640×360 and no larger than 5 MB. Exclude passwords, confidential records and personal data. Add one factual caption for every selected image.No screenshots selected. BackNext: score every checkpoint from observed evidence.Continue to checkpoints 3 · Seven-checkpoint worksheet Record the finding behind the tier Choose Pass, Partial, Fail or Not assessed for every checkpoint and add the evidence or limitation that supports the result. A marketing statement is not evidence. Step 1 — The Existence & Accessibility Check Is it live?Checking for dead links, infinite loading screens, or "Coming Soon" landing pages masquerading as live products. Result RequiredSelect resultNot assessedPassPartialFail Evidence / limitation Required Onboarding frictionCan a user or enterprise actually sign up, or is it gated behind broken "Contact Sales" forms? Result RequiredSelect resultNot assessedPassPartialFail Evidence / limitation Required Step 2 — Functional Testing (The "Try It Out" Phase) Core loop executionDoes the application actually do what it claims to do? (e.g. a payment gateway completing a test transaction, a logistics app's routing engine working.) Result RequiredSelect resultNot assessedPassPartialFail Evidence / limitation Required User experience (UX) & interface (UI)Assessing the logical flow, responsiveness, and basic accessibility of the platform. Result RequiredSelect resultNot assessedPassPartialFail Evidence / limitation Required Step 3 — Technical & Architectural Assessment PerformanceLoad speeds, uptime reliability, and basic stress responses. Result RequiredSelect resultNot assessedPassPartialFail Evidence / limitation Required Integration readinessAvailability, clarity, and functionality of API documentation and webhooks. Result RequiredSelect resultNot assessedPassPartialFail Evidence / limitation Required Security basicsSSL certification, basic encryption standards, and data handling transparency. Result RequiredSelect resultNot assessedPassPartialFail Evidence / limitation Required BackNext: turn the findings into a defensible tier conclusion.Continue to conclusion 4 · Tier decision record Explain the conclusion The tier must follow from the evidence above. Explain both what supports the tier and what prevents the next one. Your tier assessment Required · published after verificationSelect the tier supported by your findingsTier 0 — Concept / VaporwareTier 1 — Functional MVPTier 2 — Market-ReadyTier 3 — Enterprise-Grade Your evidence-based verdict Required · published after verificationMinimum 150 characters. Strongest evidence supporting this tier Required · published Why the next tier is not yet supported Required · published BackFinal step: identify who performed the assessment and disclose conflicts.Continue to provenance 5 · Reviewer provenance Stand behind the submission Your identity and contact details are required for accountability, but remain an internal Sandbox Africa governance record by default. The public review focuses on the evidence and verified assessment unless explicit public attribution is separately enabled. Your full name Required · internal Your email Required · private Your relationship to the solution Required · internalSelect your relationshipIndependent reviewer or researcherCustomer or product userImplementation or technology partnerEmployee or contractorFounder or ownerInvestor or advisorOther disclosed relationship Conflict disclosure Required · internal Your technical expertise / background Required · internalMinimum 40 characters. I confirm that this review is truthful, evidence-based, completed in good faith and reflects my honest technical assessment. I have accurately disclosed my relationship to the solution and any actual or potential conflicts. I confirm that the submission is accurate to the best of my knowledge, the screenshots are lawfully obtained, and the evidence contains no confidential, restricted or personal information. Before submittingSandbox Africa will verify this evidence pack. The public record will distinguish your submitted assessment from the verified publication outcome. BackSubmit complete evidence pack Website
