Kena Health was a South African telehealth service providing virtual primary-care consultations and related digital healthcare services. At the assessment date, no current accessible product surface could be independently verified.
The evidence supports recording Kena Health as historically operational but not currently verifiable as an accessible digital service at the assessment date. Keep Tier 0: no current core workflow could be independently accessed or tested.
The reviewer could not reach the website, locate a usable web platform or find an accessible mobile application, leaving onboarding and consultation functionality untestable.
A current app-history record states that the Kena Health Android app was removed from Google Play on 17 September 2025. The website also failed to provide a reliable current product surface during verification.
No current independently testable product surface.
Historical operation is not evidence of current product availability.
These images formed part of the evidence pack considered during verification. Full-standard records retain the contributor's factual caption for each screenshot.
The verified result is the official public checkpoint record. For earlier-standard reviews, these findings may have been reconstructed from preserved evidence during Sandbox Africa’s 2026 audit; they are not presented as if the contributor originally completed a structured worksheet. Contributor-submitted checkpoint wording is shown only where explicit public reviewer attribution has been enabled.
Checking for dead links, infinite loading screens, or "Coming Soon" landing pages masquerading as live products.
No reliable current digital product surface was reachable during the assessment; historical operation does not establish current availability.
Can a user or enterprise actually sign up, or is it gated behind broken "Contact Sales" forms?
With no reachable product surface, onboarding could not be started or verified.
Does the application actually do what it claims to do? (e.g. a payment gateway completing a test transaction, a logistics app's routing engine working.)
No consultation, booking or clinical workflow could be independently executed.
Assessing the logical flow, responsiveness, and basic accessibility of the platform.
No current product interface was available for a meaningful UX assessment.
Load speeds, uptime reliability, and basic stress responses.
Availability itself failed the reviewed evidence standard; no performance test could proceed.
Availability, clarity, and functionality of API documentation and webhooks.
No current API, webhook or integration surface was independently verified.
SSL certification, basic encryption standards, and data handling transparency.
No current product surface was available from which to verify the minimum security/data-handling baseline.
Claiming verifies company ownership and enables a response or additional evidence. It does not permit editing of the independent review.
